Civic engagement works when residents can say precisely where something matters, not just that it does. Mapsurvey turns civic participation into spatial input: people pin places, draw routes and outline areas, then answer a question or two about each one. Your team gets evidence with coordinates instead of a pile of free-text comments. Open source, free to start, no account for participants, and self-hostable when the data has to stay in-house.
What it is
Civic engagement is residents taking part in the decisions that shape where they live: a consultation on a road scheme, a participatory budget, a neighbourhood plan, a safety audit, a vote on what the park should become. Community engagement is the same relationship seen from the organisation's side, and a civic engagement platform is the software that runs it. Whatever the label, most of the input a city asks for has a location. The crossing. The dark path. The route to school. The corner where the market should be.
Map-based community engagement makes that location the answer format. Instead of a text box that asks people to describe a place, the survey asks them to mark it: a point for a spot, a line for a route, a polygon for an area. One or two short questions sit on each mark, so the why travels with the where. The result is community engagement mapping in the literal sense: every contribution is a feature with coordinates, and a hundred contributions are a layer the planning team can open in its GIS, filter, count and overlay on the plan.
It also widens who takes part. A public meeting reaches the people who can be in a room on a weekday evening. A link on a phone reaches parents, shift workers, students and the residents who would never speak in a hall but will happily draw the route they cycle every morning. Participation needs no account and takes minutes, and the survey text can be shown in 75 languages, which matters in a district where the council's language is not everyone's first.
Mapsurvey is open source under the AGPLv3 licence and free to run at any scale. A city workspace holds any number of surveys and team members; each survey has its own link, its own results map and its own public results page. The hosted service runs in the United States; a city that must keep residents' data on its own servers runs the same software there.
This page is about the methods. The community engagement platform page describes the software itself, and the citizen engagement platform page answers a council's buying questions: free plan, price for a small jurisdiction, data ownership, uptime.
How to engage people on a map
'Where do you feel unsafe cycling?' beats 'Tell us about cycling'. Choose the geometry that fits the answer, attach a short follow-up question to each mark, and add your own layer, such as the existing network or the draft plan, so people react to something real.
A link in the newsletter, a QR code at the bus stop, an embed on the project page. Residents mark the map on their phone and answer the questions on each place. Show earlier contributions on a shared map and let people react to them, so the engagement is a conversation, not a mailbox.
Why spatial
'The crossing by the school is dangerous' beats 'traffic is bad'. Spatial input makes civic involvement actionable for planners and engineers.
An online map reaches residents who never attend a town hall. A link is all they need, in any of 75 languages.
Every contribution is a data point with coordinates. Aggregate, filter and map the input, then show your community you used it.
Residents see what others marked and react with a thumbs up or down and a comment, so the second week builds on the first.
Open source (AGPLv3) with GeoJSON, Excel and Shapefile export. Your community's input stays yours; self-host it if your policies require.
No per-survey, per-seat or per-response fees. One workspace runs every engagement of the year.
Compared
Two civic participation suites a city is likely to be evaluating: one commercial, one open source. Both do far more than maps. The question is whether you need a democracy platform or a map that people can answer on by Friday.
| Mapsurvey | Go Vocal (ex-CitizenLab) | Consul | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier for real projects | Yes, hosted, unlimited surveys and responses | Free Edition to run yourself; hosted plans by quote | Free software; hosting and support from partners |
| Pricing | Published: free, or one flat workspace price | Quote only; per-licence, per-year rates listed on UK G-Cloud | Software free; partner hosting prices not published |
| Open source / self-hosting | Yes, AGPLv3, Docker on your servers | Free Edition under AGPLv3; commercial edition SaaS only | Yes, AGPLv3 |
| What a respondent can draw | Points, lines and polygons, each with follow-up questions | Pins, lines and polygons | A location on a proposal; line or polygon drawing not published |
| GIS export of responses | GeoJSON, GeoPackage, Shapefile, KML, plus CSV and Excel | CSV, XLSX, PDF; a unified format described as importable in GIS tools | Not published |
| Respondent account | None needed | Not published; identity federation offered | Registration required to propose, comment or vote |
| Languages | 75, included | 27, plus auto-translation on higher plans | Community-translated; count not published |
| Scope | Map-based surveys, shared maps, results pages | Full participation suite: ideation, voting, participatory budgeting, surveys, maps | Full democracy suite: proposals, debates, voting, participatory budgeting |
| Accessibility statement | No formal conformance audit yet | WCAG 2.2 AA, ISO 27001 | Follows WCAG; level not declared |
Competitor details reflect the vendors' published pages, documentation and UK G-Cloud listings as of October 2026; verify current specifics with the vendor or the project. 'Not published' means the public material does not say.
Mapsurvey is independent and founder-led. Describe the decision you are engaging on and you will get a reply from the developer, often with a draft survey you can open the same day.
Email the developerMethods
Pricing
Not a trial and not a sandbox: the whole collection and analysis product, with no cap on surveys, respondents or team members.
One workspace, any number of users, surveys and responses. No per-project, per-seat or per-response metering, so a consultancy can run every engagement of the year on one line item.
Pro is in early access: the workspace price is fixed, the feature list is being finished with the first customers, and existing accounts keep what they have. If a grant or a council budget needs an invoice rather than a card, write to us.
FAQ