Mapsurvey is a community engagement platform built around the map. Residents pin the places, draw the routes and outline the areas their answer is about, then answer the questions attached to each one. Your team gets a map and a table of every response, exportable to QGIS, ArcGIS or Excel, instead of a mailbox of free text. Free for a real project, open source, and self-hostable when your data has to stay in-house.
What it is
A community engagement platform is the software a council, a city department, an agency or a consultancy uses to collect public input online and turn it into something a committee can act on. Most platforms are built around pages and forms: a project page, a survey, a comment box, a report. A map-based platform starts from a different question. Where? Where is the crossing unsafe, which street needs lighting, which route do you cycle, which corner of the park should stay as it is. People answer by marking the place, and the answer arrives with coordinates attached.
That changes what the team receives. A free-text comment that says 'the junction by the school is dangerous' has to be read, interpreted and geocoded by hand before it can be counted. A pin on that junction, with a follow-up question about why, is already a data point. Fifty of them are a cluster. Five hundred are evidence for a capital bid. This is what makes map-based community engagement a planning tool rather than a mailbox: the same software that collects the input also produces the map, the counts and the export the GIS team needs.
Local government teams call the same thing a public engagement platform, public participation software or public involvement software, depending on the country and the statute. Consultancies call it stakeholder engagement. Universities call it participatory GIS. Mapsurvey serves all of them with one survey builder: ordinary question types for the people, places and preferences, and map question types for the where. Each survey has a public link that opens on any phone, needs no account, and can be embedded in the project page you already have.
The platform is open source under the AGPLv3 licence. The hosted version runs on servers in the United States today; a team that needs the data to stay inside its own jurisdiction runs the same Docker stack on its own infrastructure, at no licence cost, and a choice of hosting region is on the Pro roadmap. Either way the data is yours: every response exports, every survey can be deleted, and nothing is locked behind a tier.
This page is about what the software does. A council procurement team working through the buying questions, from free plans to data ownership and uptime, will find them answered on the citizen engagement platform page.
How it works
Pick a point, line or polygon question for the where, attach follow-up questions to each mark, and upload your own reference layer, such as the proposed scheme or the existing network, so residents react to what you are actually planning.
Residents open the link on a phone or a desktop, mark the map, answer the questions on each place and submit. Survey text can be offered in 75 languages, and a QR code on a poster or a flyer brings the offline audience in.
Why teams choose it
Participants respond exactly where the issue is: a junction, a route, a parcel. Points, lines and polygons, each with its own follow-up questions.
Show earlier contributions on a shared map and let residents react to them with a thumbs up or down and a comment, so the second week of an engagement builds on the first.
Upload the proposal as a GeoJSON layer from any GIS. Residents comment on the features you drew, not on a blank basemap.
Export everything, including the geometry, at any time. Self-host on your own infrastructure if your policies require it. No lock-in.
Auditable and adaptable. Procurement-friendly, and no black box between you and your community's input.
Run as many engagements as you need on one workspace. Pricing that fits a public or non-profit budget, not enterprise licensing.
Compared
The two platforms most local-government buyers already have a quote from. Both are capable engagement hubs; the differences are the price, the licence and what a resident can draw.
| Mapsurvey | Social Pinpoint (Open Point) | EngagementHQ (Granicus) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier for real projects | Yes, unlimited surveys and responses | No; pricing on request | No; limited trial subject to scoping |
| Pricing | Published: free, or one flat workspace price | Quote only; no current public price list, map tools on a higher tier | Quote only |
| Open source / self-hosting | Yes, AGPLv3, Docker on your servers | No, SaaS only | No, SaaS only |
| What a respondent can draw | Points, lines and polygons, each with follow-up questions | Point markers on the current Social Map; lines and shapes were a legacy Classic feature | Pin drop on the Places tool; line or polygon drawing by respondents not published |
| GIS export of responses | GeoJSON, GeoPackage, Shapefile, KML, plus CSV and Excel | XLS, CSV, PDF and GeoJSON from Social Map reporting | Excel, CSV, PDF; GIS formats not published |
| Respondent account | None needed | Not published | Unverified participation allowed on Places; registration configurable |
| Languages | 75, included | Multilingual add-on | Not published |
| Hosting region | United States (hosted), or self-host anywhere | AWS in the nominated country | AWS per jurisdiction (US, Canada, UK, Australia) |
| Accessibility statement | No formal conformance audit yet | WCAG 2.2 AA alignment, VPAT | WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA, ISO 27001 |
Competitor details reflect the vendors' published pages, help centres and UK G-Cloud listings as of October 2026; verify current specifics with the vendor. 'Not published' means the vendor's public material does not say.
Mapsurvey is independent and founder-led. Email the developer directly with a migration, self-hosting, data-processing or 'does it do X?' question and you will get an answer from the person who can change the product.
Email the developerWho runs engagement on it
Community engagement means something different to each team, but the where is the same question everywhere. These are the projects teams run on Mapsurvey most often:
Pricing
Not a trial and not a sandbox: the whole collection and analysis product, with no cap on surveys, respondents or team members.
One workspace, any number of users, surveys and responses. No per-project, per-seat or per-response metering, so a consultancy can run every engagement of the year on one line item.
Pro is in early access: the workspace price is fixed, the feature list is being finished with the first customers, and existing accounts keep what they have. If a grant or a council budget needs an invoice rather than a card, write to us.
FAQ